![]() |
Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Edited Legal Collections Data |
Book Title: Trade Marks at the Limit
Editor(s): Phillips, Jeremy
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
ISBN (hard cover): 9781845427382
Section: Chapter 15
Section Title: The Impact of Permitted Use on Trade Mark Valuation
Author(s): Bezant, Mark
Number of pages: 14
Extract:
15. The impact of permitted use on trade
mark valuation
Mark Bezant
WORKING WITH KIDS AND ANIMALS
One afternoon when I was puzzling over this topic, my youngest son Edward
wandered into my study. `Dad', he asked, `Why is it that people sponsor differ-
ent breakfast cereals?' Thrown by the question, I ducked behind one of my
own. `Why do you think it is?' I asked. `Because that's just the way it is', he
replied instantly. Outclassed, inevitably, by an eight year old, I asked him
which were his favourite cereals. He obligingly reeled off a long list of names:
`Cinnamon Grahams'; `Golden Nuggets'; `Honey Nut Cheerios'; `Cookie
Crisp'; `Chocolate Weetabix'; `Ricicles'.
I was struck by several things: the common use of compound trade marks,
trade marks that had descriptive prefixes, branding based on attributes such
as flavours and product names containing common or everyday terms.
Curiosity aroused, I pushed on with the conversation. It turned out he'd heard
of companies like Nestlé (`they make food') and Kellogg's (`they make
breakfast cereals'). But in his mind the `sponsors' were someone else: the
characters and images on the packets such as monkeys, a wolf, a prospector
and `a man wearing glasses' (it turned out he was `a scientist').The use of
trade marks and branding to promote breakfast cereals is clearly complex and
illustrates the situation more broadly. Brands are stretched (new flavours;
new product sizes), repositioned or relaunched (health-oriented; concentra-
tion-enhancing for children), and promoted ...
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2006/243.html