AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2007 >> [2007] ELECD 227

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

"Conclusion: Hobbes and the Political Economy of Power" [2007] ELECD 227; in Marciano, Alain; Josselin, Jean-Michel (eds), "Democracy, Freedom and Coercion" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2007)

Book Title: Democracy, Freedom and Coercion

Editor(s): Marciano, Alain; Josselin, Jean-Michel

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781847201263

Section Title: Conclusion: Hobbes and the Political Economy of Power

Number of pages: 16

Extract:

Conclusion: Hobbes and the political
economy of power
Donald Wittman

INTRODUCTION

Is the choice in Iraq between anarchy and a ruthless dictatorship or is there
a middle way? And if there is a middle way in Iraq or elsewhere, what con-
ditions foster such an outcome? The fundamental political problem is that
the power to prevent anarchy is also the power to impose one's will, which
I will refer to as the Hobbesian dilemma. Yet we do observe relatively
benign dictatorships (as in Singapore) and a relative respect for property
and civil rights in the democracies of North America and Western Europe.
Here, I discuss why the choice need not be limited to brutish anarchy and
a self-aggrandizing Leviathan. I also derive the conditions that encourage
the middle solution. At the same time, I explain why dictatorships are
inclined to make bad economic policies.
For a person trained in public choice theory, the puzzle is why govern-
ments are not always repressive military regimes and dictatorships. Public
choice emphasizes the self-interest of bureaucrats, politicians and special
interest groups (typically within a democratic setting). But the net result in
these models is a relatively modest increase in government expenditure (rel-
ative to what the median voter might desire) in favor of the special inter-
ests. Here, we consider a much more profound possibility that arises when
certain segments of society, particularly the military, have the power to
coerce. One would expect that those with military and political power
...


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2007/227.html