AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2010 >> [2010] ELECD 672

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Driscoll, Lindsay --- "England and Wales: Pemsel Plus" [2010] ELECD 672; in McGregor-Lowndes, Myles; O’Halloran, Kerry (eds), "Modernising Charity Law" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010)

Book Title: Modernising Charity Law

Editor(s): McGregor-Lowndes, Myles; O’Halloran, Kerry

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781849802505

Section: Chapter 2

Section Title: England and Wales: Pemsel Plus

Author(s): Driscoll, Lindsay

Number of pages: 26

Extract:

2. England and Wales: Pemsel plus
Lindsay Driscoll

INTRODUCTION ­ HISTORY

There is a long history of attempts at reform of charity law and proposals
for a statutory definition in England and Wales. As far back as 1952 the
Nathan Committee recommended a statutory definition of charity based
on the Pemsel categories which preserved the existing case law1 but the
legislation that followed, the Charities Act 1960, which introduced charity
registration, omitted this recommendation. The next major report on
charity law was the Goodman Committee Report2 of 1976, which recom-
mended an updated list of the objects contained in the 1601 Preamble,
but no action was taken on this. The Charities Act 1992, which followed
the White Paper Charities: a Framework for the Future, introduced major
reforms of charity law, mainly with regard to the regulation and account-
ability of charities, but again omitted any reference to definition. In each
case there was a reluctance on the part of government to open the flood-
gates of debate on problem cases within existing charitable purposes and
calls for new ones from a wide range of interest groups.
Over fifty years after the first recommendation, the statutory definition
finally reached the statute book in 2006 but in all the debates and press
coverage this has been totally overshadowed by discussion of the new
emphasis on public benefit, particularly how this will affect fee-charging
charitable schools and religious charities. It is the public benefit aspect
rather than any extension of charitable purposes which ...


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2010/672.html