AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2013 >> [2013] ELECD 208

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Schovsbo, Jens --- "Constructing an efficient and balanced European patent system: 'muddling through'" [2013] ELECD 208; in Geiger, Christophe (ed), "Constructing European Intellectual Property" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2013) 215

Book Title: Constructing European Intellectual Property

Editor(s): Geiger, Christophe

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781781001639

Section: Chapter 9

Section Title: Constructing an efficient and balanced European patent system: 'muddling through'

Author(s): Schovsbo, Jens

Number of pages: 16

Abstract/Description:

The title I have been given calls for a number of clarifications: Apatent system consists of both of rules and institutions. At the core are the specific patent rules and the patent offices (PTOs) which are dedicated to the issuing of patents. Often complications will arise at the interface between the patent system and the general legal system consisting of e.g. contract law, competition law and procedural law, the general court system, and the international framework found in the IPR conventions and treaties. In the following my focus will be limited to the specific patent rules and institution of the EU. An efficient patent system is one that achieves the overall goals set out for it and a balanced system is one that does so in a way which maximizes the overall societal interests. The notion of ‘balance’ implies that patents incur costs on society. The aim of the legislator, therefore, should be to balance the costs with the gains. Behind these points, is the general idea that issuing patents is not in itself the goal of the patent system. Instead, patents are the means for achieving certain overall societal goals. A European (in the following ‘EU’) patent system (as opposed to a global or national one) seeks to protect specific EU policy interests and to provide EU companies (and ultimately the EU citizens) with the advantage of efficient protection on their home market. The development on the EU level needs to be synchronized with the developments on the global scene. For the following my focus will be on the regional/national interface. Any EU legislative harmonization initiative thus also needs to take into account the specific European historical and cultural background. Because of the expansion of the patentable subject matter and since patent harmonization now also covers matters of procedural law and issues such as litigation the task of finding common EU grounds has become more difficult.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2013/208.html