AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2015 >> [2015] ELECD 1310

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Mahmud, Tayyab --- "Neoliberalism, debt and discipline" [2015] ELECD 1310; in Mattei, Ugo; Haskell, D. John (eds), "Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015) 69

Book Title: Research Handbook on Political Economy and Law

Editor(s): Mattei, Ugo; Haskell, D. John

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781781005347

Section: Chapter 5

Section Title: Neoliberalism, debt and discipline

Author(s): Mahmud, Tayyab

Number of pages: 21

Abstract/Description:

In the neoliberal reorganization of capitalism since the late 1970s, hegemony of finance capital displaced Keynesian welfare. This transformation entailed a roll-back of the welfare state, breaking the power of organized labor, precarization of labor markets, financialization of the economy, and exponential expansion of debt. In this ensemble, debt sustained aggregate demand, fueled liquidity to lubricate financialization, and facilitated assemblages of entrepreneurial subjects responsible for their own economic security. Public welfare was replaced by self-care, and working classes were obliged to fund their private welfare through private debt, while calibrating their conduct with demands of a precarious labor market. Under neoliberal financialization, debt was deployed as the primary instrument for the assemblage of self-caring subjects through ‘modes of subjectification … in which people are invited to recognize their moral obligations.’ The citizen was reconstituted as homo economicus, ‘an entrepreneur, an entrepreneur of himself,’ and one that is ‘eminently governable’ through the technologies of the self, motivated by the incentive structure of the market. The hidden hand of the market and the iron fist of the law worked in concert to forge governmentalities that sutured debt with discipline. This ensemble underscored that capitalism is not a de-politicized and de-subjectified market economy governed by ‘economic laws,’ but a set of politically contested social relations under the hegemony of capital. Capitalism is a relation of power where the state and the market remain intertwined.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2015/1310.html