AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2015 >> [2015] ELECD 443

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Calboli, Irene --- "Intellectual property protection for fame, luxury, wines and spirits: Lex specialis for a corporate “dolce vita” or a “good-quality life”?" [2015] ELECD 443; in Dinwoodie, B. Graeme (ed), "Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015) 156

Book Title: Intellectual Property and General Legal Principles

Editor(s): Dinwoodie, B. Graeme

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781784714949

Section: Chapter 8

Section Title: Intellectual property protection for fame, luxury, wines and spirits: Lex specialis for a corporate “dolce vita” or a “good-quality life”?

Author(s): Calboli, Irene

Number of pages: 25

Abstract/Description:

In this chapter, I consider two exceptions to the general provisions (leges generales) of intellectual property law governing the protection of trademarks and geographical indications of origin (GIs). In particular, I consider the leges speciales that have been introduced with respect to two specific subject matters by the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS): anti-dilution protection for well-known marks, as provided in Article 16.3, and anti-usurpation protection for GIs identifying wines and spirits, as provided in Article 23. This latter protection could be extended to other GIs as part of the built-in agenda also introduced by TRIPS. In both cases, these leges speciales enhance the protection granted, respectively, to well-known marks and GIs identifying wines and spirits, beyond the protection granted to marks and GIs in general (which is limited to acts that could amount to confuse and mislead consumers in the marketplace). Based upon this analysis, I explore whether these leges speciales should be viewed merely as an additional example of the growing pressure in favor of enhanced protection that has characterized intellectual property debate in the past decades, or whether Articles 16.3 and 23 of TRIPS could also be explained differently.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2015/443.html