AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2015 >> [2015] ELECD 831

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Blair, Margaret M. --- "Boards of directors and corporate performance under a team production model" [2015] ELECD 831; in Hill, G. Jennifer; Thomas, S. Randall (eds), "Research Handbook on Shareholder Power" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015) 249

Book Title: Research Handbook on Shareholder Power

Editor(s): Hill, G. Jennifer; Thomas, S. Randall

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781782546849

Section: Chapter 12

Section Title: Boards of directors and corporate performance under a team production model

Author(s): Blair, Margaret M.

Number of pages: 20

Abstract/Description:

For at least the last three decades, the standard framework in legal scholarship and finance for thinking about shareholder power and the role of corporate boards of directors has been the principal-agent model (Jensen and Meckling 1976; Fama 1980; Easterbrook and Fischel 1991). Under this model corporations are viewed as bundles of assets that belong to shareholders. In fact Grossman and Hart (1986) define a ‘firm’ as ‘those assets that it owns or over which it has control’. Boards of directors are viewed as agents of shareholders (Jensen and Meckling 1976; Easterbrook and Fischel 1991) whose job it is to oversee the work that corporate managers do, to make sure managers focus on maximizing the value of equity in the corporation (Baysinger and Butler 1985; Bainbridge 2003, 2006). Despite this widespread belief about what boards of directors are supposed to do, scholars of corporate governance do not much agree about what factors make boards of directors more effective. With few exceptions (which will be discussed in section I), the findings of empirical research on the relationship between board structure, composition, or practices, and corporate performance, have been consistently mixed and inconclusive, leading some scholars to complain that corporate boards of directors are generally ineffectual at monitoring corporate managers (Gevurtz 2003).


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2015/831.html