AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2015 >> [2015] ELECD 837

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Belcredi, Massimo; Enriques, Luca --- "Institutional investor activism in a context of concentrated ownership and high private benefits of control: the case of Italy" [2015] ELECD 837; in Hill, G. Jennifer; Thomas, S. Randall (eds), "Research Handbook on Shareholder Power" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015) 383

Book Title: Research Handbook on Shareholder Power

Editor(s): Hill, G. Jennifer; Thomas, S. Randall

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781782546849

Section: Chapter 18

Section Title: Institutional investor activism in a context of concentrated ownership and high private benefits of control: the case of Italy

Author(s): Belcredi, Massimo; Enriques, Luca

Number of pages: 21

Abstract/Description:

At first sight Italy looks like an unfavorable corporate environment for shareholder activism: concentrated ownership, inadequate legal protection for minority shareholders (Shleifer and Vishny 1997), and an apparent disregard for their interests by controlling shareholders (Macey 1998; Enriques 2002) are no welcoming signs for those interested in stirring for change to maximize the return on their investment. Yet, we find a non-negligible volume of ‘core’ active institutional investment (pressing on management, usually on governance issues and/or corporate strategy and specific transactions, possibly accompanied by ‘voice’ at shareholder meetings), together with some idiosyncratic forms of activism (e.g. the appointment of ‘minority’ directors on the boards of Italian listed companies). The research question we thus address is whether we see genuine value-oriented activism or just another strategy to engage in a privileged relationship with controlling shareholders to share in the private benefits of control. Anticipating our conclusion, we find insufficient evidence to support this ‘dark side’ (Rock 1994) view of activism. Quite on the contrary, we provide anecdotal evidence of activist initiatives aimed to curb the extraction of private benefits by dominant shareholders. For space reasons alone our focus is on activism by institutional investors (mutual, pension and hedge funds).


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2015/837.html