AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2016 >> [2016] ELECD 978

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

"Conclusions: concrete proposals for change: 14 theses" [2016] ELECD 978; in van Klink, Bart; de Vries, Ubaldus (eds), "Academic Learning in Law" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2016) 314

Book Title: Academic Learning in Law

Editor(s): van Klink, Bart; de Vries, Ubaldus

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN (hard cover): 9781784714888

Section: Chapter 16

Section Title: Conclusions: concrete proposals for change: 14 theses

Number of pages: 9

Abstract/Description:

Hopefully, the reader of this book will be inspired by the previous chapters to experiment in his or her teaching with some of the ideas discussed and the theoretical viewpoints presented in the first part. Teachers may be tempted to revise the perspective taken in a course, devise new interactive methods or reflect on their own teaching philosophy. For that purpose, each contributor has drafted a concrete proposal in the form of a thesis that might serve as a stepping-stone for actual change in the educational system in general or learning methods in particular. The theses listed below follow the order of the contributions. Instead of looking for the ‘right answer’, academic legal education should focus more on raising the right questions. Scientific inquiry always starts with a question. If it is a good question, it opens up a whole new field of research which may lead to innovative and interesting answers. However, every answer in science has a provisional character, and can and will be challenged by further research. That makes the quest for knowledge endless. In legal education, however, there is a tendency to present knowledge as a fixed and indisputable set of descriptive statements about the law – the legal doctrine – which the student is expected to learn by heart and to reproduce at the exam. Skeptical legal education questions this doctrinal approach.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2016/978.html