AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2018 >> [2018] ELECD 871

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Dougherty, F. Jay --- "Now you own it, now you don’t – or do you? Copyright and related rights in magic productions and performances" [2018] ELECD 871; in Bonadio, Enrico; Lucchi, Nicola (eds), "Non-Conventional Copyright" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2018) 237

Book Title: Non-Conventional Copyright

Editor(s): Bonadio, Enrico; Lucchi, Nicola

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

ISBN: 9781786434067

Section: Chapter 11

Section Title: Now you own it, now you don’t – or do you? Copyright and related rights in magic productions and performances

Author(s): Dougherty, F. Jay

Number of pages: 34

Abstract/Description:

Magic has many forms, and many variations in its content. Patent and trade secret laws can provide legal rights to magicians in some cases, but often are not practicable or are ineffective. Copyright law might provide the magician with a property right, but its limiting doctrines preclude protection in many instances. With all of the elements carved out of potential copyright protection, what, if anything, remains? This chapter will explore that question, primarily under U.S. law. It will discuss several types of copyrightable subject matter that might in some circumstances be found in a magician’s performance. The level of protectability will depend upon the type of magic and its presentation. In some cases, a magic performance may include copyright-protected characters, dialogue, dramatic works, choreography, or perhaps most promisingly, copyrightable pantomime. After exploring both the limits on copyright and potentially protectable subject matter, the chapter will discuss in some detail two judicial decisions that have confronted claims for the protection of magic productions, one where the magician failed to receive protection and a more recent case where the magician, Teller, was successful. Finally, it will briefly discuss potential legal claims protecting the performance itself. Some other nations recognize a type of right related to copyright, known as ‘performers’ rights’. The chapter will conclude with a brief discussion of certain other legal theories that might provide legal protection to a magician’s performance, namely, ‘common law’ copyright, unfair competition and the right of publicity. DelGaudio knows that when many of us think of magic, we summon cartoonish stereotypes: top hats and wands at children’s birthday parties, etc. His conviction – one he articulates with winning passion and occasional Shakespeare-quoting grandiosity – is that magic offers a means of exploring ideas just as complex, and of provoking emotions just as powerful, as those encountered in any other art form.1 1.Jonah Weiner, The Magician Who Wants to Break Magic, N.Y. Times (March 15, 2017), https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/15/magazine/derek-delgaudio-the-magician-who-wants-to-break-magic.html (last accessed Nov. 29, 2017).


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2018/871.html