AustLII Home | Databases | WorldLII | Search | Feedback

Edited Legal Collections Data

You are here:  AustLII >> Databases >> Edited Legal Collections Data >> 2019 >> [2019] ELECD 2157

Database Search | Name Search | Recent Articles | Noteup | LawCite | Help

Suthersanen, Uma --- "Utility models: do they really serve national innovation strategies?" [2019] ELECD 2157; in Drexl, Josef; Kamperman Sanders, Anselm (eds), "The Innovation Society and Intellectual Property" (Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019) 2

Book Title: The Innovation Society and Intellectual Property

Editor(s): Drexl, Josef; Kamperman Sanders, Anselm

Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing

Section: Chapter 1

Section Title: Utility models: do they really serve national innovation strategies?

Author(s): Suthersanen, Uma

Number of pages: 23

Abstract/Description:

Does the utility model law offer a robust ecosystem promoting innovation? Is it viable for a country to introduce a second-tier patent law on the basis that the defects of the patent system can be solved? This chapter considers the normative rationales for protecting subpatentable innovation by analysing the concept of utility model across several jurisdictions and through multiple timelines. The Chinese, German and South Korean experiences show that utility model protection may enhance the behaviour of SMEs within developing economies and develop the innovative capacity of economies at specific stages of their development. However, the Japanese and Australian case studies show that once national innovative capacities have been reached, the disadvantages of utility models outweigh the perceived advantages. The empirical evidence gathered in a multitude of studies suggest that the task of modelling an optimal utility model regime will be a highly complex and futile task.


AustLII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2019/2157.html