Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Edited Legal Collections Data |
Book Title: Comparative Constitution Making
Editor(s): Landau, David; Lerner, Hanna
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Section: Chapter 2
Section Title: Revolutions and constitution making
Author(s): Arato, Andrew
Number of pages: 20
Abstract/Description:
The chapter considers the strong yet problematic relationship of revolution and constitution in the modern world. Relying on Hannah Arendt, it affirms both a historical relationship as well as a logical “elective affinity” between revolution and constitution. Nevertheless, I argue that if interpret constitution in the normative sense, i.e. as some version of constitutionalism, then revolutions more often than not culminate in the contrary: in forms of institutionalized (rather than just temporary) dictatorships. According to the argument, this too is a logical and not merely a historical relationship, although not absolutely necessary or unavoidable. Using the lessons of post-revolutionary democratic transitions in South Africa and Central Europe, and considering contemporary examples such as Colombia and Tunisia, I argue that it depends on the form of constitution making whether or not the dictatorial logic and outcome can be avoided in revolutions or quasi-revolutions. In particular, the replacement of a single stage model relying on a sovereign constituent assembly, should be replaced to whatever extent possible by multi stage approaches in which no agent can be considered sovereign.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2019/2409.html