![]() |
Home
| Databases
| WorldLII
| Search
| Feedback
Edited Legal Collections Data |
Book Title: Comparative Constitution Making
Editor(s): Landau, David; Lerner, Hanna
Publisher: Edward Elgar Publishing
Section: Chapter 8
Section Title: Constitutional design deferred
Author(s): Dixon, Rosalind
Number of pages: 21
Abstract/Description:
Constitution makers often leave key issues undecided, or choose to defer certain issues for future resolution. This chapter examines this practice of constitutional ‘deferral’, and its different variants in constitution-making processes worldwide – including in the form of abstract (rather than specific) constitutional language, express by-law clauses and conflicting constitutional provisions. It considers how deferral of this kind can help address both ‘decision’ and ‘error’ costs in processes of constitution-making, but also raise its own dangers of long-term delay or ‘burdens of inertia’ in constitutional implementation. Finally, it considers what if any solutions there may be to this problem of recursive constitutional referral, including the idea of time-frames for deferred action, and judicial enforcement of legislative duties of constitutional implementation.
AustLII:
Copyright Policy
|
Disclaimers
|
Privacy Policy
|
Feedback
URL: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/journals/ELECD/2019/2415.html