LawCite Search | LawCite Markup Tool | Help | Feedback

Law
Cite


Cases Referring to this Journal Article | Law Reform Reports Referring to this Journal Article | Law Journal Articles Referring to this Journal Article | Legislation Cited | Cases and Articles Cited

Help

"Why Don't the Gatekeepers Guard the Gates? Comments Prompted by Edmond"   flag 

(2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 109
Williams, Keelah E G; Saks, Michael J
Adelaide Law Review
Australia

Cases and Articles Cited

Case Name Citation(s) Court Jurisdiction Date †  Full Text Citation Index
(2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 111 (2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 111 Adelaide Law Review Australia circa 2015 HeinOnline / Informit flag 1
"What Lawyers Should Know About the Forensic 'Sciences'" (2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 33 Adelaide Law Review Australia circa 2015 AustLII flag 10
(2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 113 (2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 113 Adelaide Law Review Australia circa 2015 HeinOnline / Informit flag 1
(2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 115 (2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 115 Adelaide Law Review Australia circa 2015 HeinOnline / Informit flag 1
(2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 117 (2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 117 Adelaide Law Review Australia circa 2015 HeinOnline / Informit flag 1
(2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 119 (2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 119 Adelaide Law Review Australia circa 2015 HeinOnline / Informit flag 1
(2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 121 (2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 121 Adelaide Law Review Australia circa 2015 HeinOnline / Informit flag 1
(2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 123 (2015) 36 Adelaide Law Review 123 Adelaide Law Review Australia circa 2015 HeinOnline / Informit flag 1
(2013) 17 Virginia Journal of Law and Technology 356 (2013) 17 Virginia Journal of Law and Technology 356 Virginia Journal of Law and Technology United States circa 2013 LexisNexis flag 1
"Forensic Science: Why No Research?" (2010) 38 Fordham Urban Law Journal 503 Fordham Urban Law Journal United States circa 2010 HeinOnline / Westlaw flag 1
"Invalid Forensic Science Testimony and Wrongful Convictions" (2009) 95 Virginia Law Review 1 Virginia Law Review United States circa 2009 LexisNexis flag 5
"The Individualization Fallacy in Forensic Science Evidence" (2008) 61 Vanderbilt Law Review 199 Vanderbilt Law Review United States circa 2008 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 6
"Protecting Factfinders from Being Overly Misled, While Still Admitting Weakly Supported Forensic Science into Evidence" (2007) 43 Tulsa Law Review 609 Tulsa Law Review United States circa 2007 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 2
United States v Cline 349 F3d 1276 United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit United States 21 Nov 2003 WorldLII flag 14
"The Merits of the Paternalistic Justification for Restrictions on the Admissibility of Expert Evidence" (2003) 33 Seton Hall Law Review 881 Seton Hall Law Review United States circa 2003 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 3
"The Daubert/Kumho Implications Of Observer Effects In Forensic Science: Hidden Problems Of Expectation And Suggestion" (2002) 90 California Law Review 1 California Law Review United States circa 2002 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 8
"Assessment of the commonsense psychology underlying Daubert: Legal decision makers' abilities to evaluate expert evidence in hostile work environment cases " (2002) 8 Psychology Public Policy and Law 180 Psychology, Public Policy, and Law circa 2002 LexisNexis 1
"Asking the Gatekeepers: A National Survey of Judges on Judging Expert Evidence in a Post-Daubert World" (2001) 25 Law and Human Behavior 433 Law and Human Behavior circa 2001 Westlaw 4
Kumho Tire Co v Carmichael 526 US 137; 143 L Ed 2d 238; 119 SCt 1167 United States Supreme Court United States 23 Mar 1999 WorldLII flag 372
General Electric Co v Joiner 522 US 136; 117 SCt 512; 139 L Ed 2d 508; 139 Goebel 215 United States Supreme Court United States 15 Dec 1997 WorldLII flag 331
Daubert v Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc 509 US 579; 43 F3d 13; 113 SCt 2786; 125 L Ed 2d 469; 125 L Ed 2; (1993) 27 Idaho 2797; 61 USLW 4805; 27 USPQ2d 1200 United States Supreme Court United States 28 Jun 1993 WorldLII flag 1086
"Scientific Evidence: Defining a New Approach to Admissibility" (1982) 67 Iowa Law Review 879 Iowa Law Review United States circa 1982 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 8
United States v Starzecpyzel 880 FSupp 1027 United States circa 2002 Westlaw flag 7
US v Cline 188 FSupp 2d 1287 United States circa 2002 Westlaw flag 2
States v Horn 185 FSupp 2d 530 United States circa 2002 Westlaw flag 1
Science and Nonscience in the Courts: Daubert Meets Handwriting Identification Expertise 82 Iowa Law Review 21 Iowa Law Review United States circa 2002 HeinOnline / LexisNexis flag 3
United States v Hines 55 FSupp 2d 62 United States circa 2002 Westlaw flag 8
Frye v United States 54 App DC 46; 293 F 1013; 54 USApp DC 46; 727 FSupp 570; 293 FED 1013 United States - District of Columbia circa 2002 flag 257
United States v Johnsted 30 FSupp 3d 814 United States circa 2002 Westlaw flag 1

LawCite: Privacy | Disclaimers | Conditions of Use | Acknowledgements | Feedback