LawCite Search |
LawCite Markup Tool |
Help |
Feedback
Law Cite |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Enka Insaat Ve Sanayi AS v OOO Insurance Co Chubb |
[2020] UKSC 38; |
United Kingdom Supreme Court | United Kingdom | 9 Oct 2020 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bulong Nickel Pty Ltd, Re |
[2002] WASC 226; |
Supreme Court of Western Australia | Australia - Western Australia | 28 Jun 2002 | AustLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Godford v Oil Drilling and Exploration Pty Ltd | [2001] QDC 355 | District Court of Queensland | Australia - Queensland | 19 Nov 2001 | AustLII |
![]() |
![]() |
[1994] HKCFI 336 (16 December 1994) | [1994] HKCFI 336 | Hong Kong Court of First Instance | Hong Kong | 16 Dec 1994 | HKLII |
![]() |
![]() |
National Thermal Power Corporation v Singer Co |
[1992] INSC 146; |
Supreme Court of India | India | 7 May 1992 | LIIofIndia |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
"Goldsbrough Mort & Co Ltd v Hall" | [1950] Res Jud 27 | Thompson, B K | Australia | circa 1950 | AustLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Wanganui-Rangitikei Electric Power Board v Australian Mutual Provident Society |
[1934] HCA 3; |
High Court of Australia | Australia - Commonwealth | 26 Mar 1934 | AustLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dennys Lascelles Ltd v Borchard |
[1932] ArgusLawRp 95; |
Argus Law Reports | Australia - Victoria | 25 Oct 1932 | AustLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Kerrigan v Harrison | (1921) 62 SCR 374 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 11 Oct 1921 | Supreme Court of Canada |
![]() |
![]() |
Cooper and Sons v Nelson and Maxwell Ltd |
[1918] ArgusLawRp 124; |
Argus Law Reports | Australia | 20 Dec 1918 | AustLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Dynamit Actien - Gesellschaft (Vormals Alfred Nobel & Co) v Rio Tinto Co , Ltd | [1918] UKHL 784 | House of Lords | United Kingdom | 25 Jan 1918 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() |
Dampskibs Aktieselskapet Aurdal v Compania De Navegacion La Estrella | [1916] ScotLR 679 | United Kingdom - Scotland | 4 Jul 1916 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Lister's Judicial Factor v Syme | [1913] ScotLR 166 | United Kingdom - Scotland | 19 Dec 1913 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() |
|
New Zealand Shipping Co (Ltd) v Tyree SC Christchurch |
[1912] NZGazLawRp 97; |
New Zealand Gazette Law Reports | New Zealand | 14 Jun 1912 | NZLII |
![]() |
![]() |
British South Africa Co v De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ld |
[1910] UKLawRpCh 93; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 5 Jul 1910 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Measures Brothers, Ld v Measures |
[1910] UKLawRpCh 68; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 11 May 1910 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Moulis v Owen |
[1907] UKLawRpKQB 41; |
United Kingdom | 15 Mar 1907 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
Currie, John Lang, In the Will of |
[1899] VicLawRp 124; |
Australia - Victoria | 24 Oct 1899 | AustLII |
![]() |
![]() |
|
South African Breweries, Ltd v King |
[1899] UKLawRpCh 98; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 27 Jun 1899 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Hamlyn & Co v Talisker Distillery |
[1894] UKLawRpAC 29; |
United Kingdom | 10 May 1894 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Talisker Distillery v Hamlyn & Co | [1893] ScotLR 31_143 | United Kingdom - Scotland | 30 Nov 1893 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Shedlock and Hudson v Hannay | [1891] ScotLR 28_560 | United Kingdom - Scotland | 30 Jan 1891 | BAILII |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Johnson v Billyard |
[1890] NSWLawRp 65; |
Supreme Court of New South Wales | Australia - New South Wales | 21 Aug 1890 | AustLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Missouri Steamship Co, In re |
[1889] UKLawRpCh 82; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 2 May 1889 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
McKenna v FB McNamee & Co | (1888) 15 SCR 311 | Supreme Court of Canada | Canada | 15 Mar 1888 | Supreme Court of Canada |
![]() |
![]() |
R v Doutre |
[1884] UKLawRpAC 39; |
United Kingdom | 12 Jul 1884 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Journal Article Title | Citation(s) | Author | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
"Lex Mercatoria: Can General Principles of Law Govern International Commercial Contracts" | (2004) 10 Canterbury Law Review 36 | Howarth, Richard J | New Zealand | circa 2004 | NZLII |
![]() |
![]() |
"Book Review: Policy and Pragmatism in the Conflict of Laws" | (2002) 26 Melbourne University Law Review 236 | Garnett, R | Australia | circa 2002 | AustLII |
![]() |
![]() |
"Choice of Law Clauses in International Contracts: Overseas Developments" | (1992) 5 Canterbury Law Review 126 | Richardson, N | New Zealand | circa 1992 | NZLII |
![]() |
![]() |
"Goldsbrough Mort & Co Ltd v Hall" | [1950] Res Jud 27 | Thompson, B K | Australia | circa 1950 | AustLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Case Name | Citation(s) | Court | Jurisdiction | Date † | Full Text | Citation Index | |
Chartered Mercantile Bank of India, London, and China v the Netherlands India Steam Navigation Co Ltd |
[1882] UKLawRpKQB 38; |
Queen's Bench | United Kingdom | 24 Mar 1882 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Chamberlain v Napier |
[1880] UKLawRpCh 227; |
Court of Chancery | United Kingdom | 26 Jul 1880 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Greer v Poole |
[1880] UKLawRpKQB 26; |
United Kingdom | 18 Mar 1880 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cohen v South Eastern Railway Co |
[1877] UKLawRpExch 11; |
Court of Exchequer | United Kingdom | 9 Feb 1877 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Halley |
[1868] UKLawRpPC 11; |
United Kingdom | 17 Jun 1868 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co,-Appellants; The Hon Farquhar Shand,-Respondent |
[1865] EngR 616; |
Privy Council | United Kingdom | circa 1865 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
Sjoerds v Luscombe |
[1812] EngR 450; |
King's Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1812 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() |
Atkinson v Ritchie |
[1809] EngR 77; |
King's Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1809 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Palmes Robinson, Esq, versus Anne Bland |
[1760] EngR 734; |
King's Bench | United Kingdom | circa 1760 | CommonLII |
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 QB 530 |
|
United Kingdom | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() |
||
10 QB 525 |
|
United Kingdom | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() |
||
Medeiros v Hill |
|
Court of Common Pleas | United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
||
3 Moore PCCNS 291 |
|
Privy Council | United Kingdom |
![]() |
![]() |
||
3 M & S 267 |
|
King's Bench | United Kingdom - Scotland |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
2 Camp 57 |
|
![]() |
|||||
1 QB 122 |
|
United Kingdom | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
||
1 QB 121 |
|
United Kingdom | LexisNexis / Westlaw |
![]() |
![]() |